Practical Reviews

PARTNER 3 Trial Shows Equipoise Between SAVR-TAVR at 7 Years in Low-Risk Patients

Key PickKey Reviews are selected for their clinical importance or significance and are marked with a key icon.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) demonstrated similar composite outcomes at 5 years in low-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. There is concern regarding the long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves. The PARTNER (the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 3 trial demonstrated a similar composite end point (death, stroke, or rehospitalization) between TAVR and SAVR at 5 years. Objective: To report the clinical outcomes at 7 years. Design: Prospective, open-label randomized trial conducted at 71 sites. Participants: Eligible patients had severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with low surgical risk, defined as a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score of Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to TAVR with a SAPIEN 3 valve, or to SAVR with a bioprosthesis according to the surgeon's discretion. Clinically meaningful revascularization was per more...

Want to read the full article?

To view, you must be an active Practical Reviews subscriber.
Login or subscribe now.